## 1.1. Criticism of Einstein's theory of relativity |

Sir Carl Popper:

*"Knowledge and information progresses faster thanks to scientists
who try to question the theory rather than those who want to prove it."*

Einstein made a serious mistake taking the Galilei’s principle of relativity,
valid only for velocities *v*<<*c*, *c* - velocity
of light, as the basis of the special (and general) theory of relativity.
He excluded the Galileian system of coordinates and preserved the validity
of law of inertia. He also generalized its validity for systems moving
at velocity .

Einstein has written: "Prominent theoretical physicists were therefore more inclined to reject the principle of relativity, in spite of the fact that no empirical data had been found as contradictory to this principle." - RELATIVITY, THE SPECIAL AND THE GENERAL THEORY BY A. EINSTEIN, AUTHORIZED TRANSLATION BY ROBERT W. LANSON, FOURTH EDITION, LONDON 1921. We will show the empirical data contradictory to Einstein’s principles of relativity.

In this juncture the question of validity of the idea of space-and-time frame has become ready to be discussed. The answer to the question may be negative. Nevertheless, there are two general facts, initially favorable to the validity of the idea of space-and-time frame.

They are:

A. The form of the interference field

B. The form of the intensity of the moving charge

In part 2 we will show, that the form of the interference field of the moving medium is not-linear (it remains to prove by the metrologers that the interference field is also non-linear for the medium at rest).

We will also show, that the form of intensity of the moving charge is asymmetric.

Einstein made a major mistake. The author proves it in revaluation Kaufmann’s, Fizeau’s and Harres’s experiments in light of the new theory (intensity of moving charge, non-linear form of the interference field, etc.).

Einstein’s two axioms:

a) law of propagation of light in all inertial frames

b) laws of physics (i. e. the law of propagation of light), identical
in all inertial frames, mean that the light is propagated in all inertial
frames at the speed of *c*. We can agree with this affirmation only
in line with the closed coordinates system, with different media firmly
connected with the frames (i. e. their coordinate axes). Otherwise, if
we have the coordinate axes (skeletons) of inertial frames with a common
medium, then is only one frame (skeleton - *x*, *y*, *z*
axes) firmly connected to the medium. Although the light is propagated
at the speed of *c*, with regard to other inertial frames, it is not
true! In all inertial frames not firmly connected to the medium with regard
to the frames (skeletons - *x*, *y*, *z*, axes only) the
light does not propagate at the speed *c*, nevertheless the light
cannot propagate in empty inertial frames (skeletons *x*, *y*,
*z*)!

According to Einstein, the expression of vacuum (emptiness) indents to be apparently the unitive medium. That is again not correct.

Nevertheless, the vacuum consists of elementary particles, which also
persist in a certain motion. It means that it is possible to connect firmly
with a given vacuum the only one frame, which "moves at the speed
of *v = 0*" with regard to the vacuum (medium). It is evident,
that it is possible to create the vacuum laboratories on various planets.
In all of them, the light is propagated at speed *c*. But with regard
to different inertial frames of planets the speed is different. There are
different vacuums, which move at different speed. Einstein had to shelter
himself behind the law of propagation of light "at all times"
so that both Einstein’s axioms could be "valid" simultaneously.

Einstein corrected the real difference of light speeds in different inertial frames (skeletons) by "different times" in a fictitious "SPACE-TIME". He helped himself with a mixture of "space-time" mathematically expressed by the Lorentz transformation equations. Then he helped himself with other new expressions, that rescue what is not possible to rescue, whereby those notions represent the following closed vicious circle:

Lorentz transformation equations

local time

covariant equations

physical definition of simultaneity

invariant interval

Lorentz transformation equations

We have shown that the idea of space-time frames is entirely wrong. All notions in the closed vicious circle, including "mean proper lifetime of particle" calculated on the basis of the Einstein’s theory of relativity which was not measured experimentally in fact are absolutely wrong. Physics is overflown by such anabashed points. It is necessary to clean the physics. It is necessary to strictly distinguish the measured values of the particles lifetime from the so called proper (shorter) Einstein’s doubtful particle lifetimes, which takes into consideration velocity and shortens the real lifetime to the shorter fictitious (incorrect) proper lifetime, shown in the tables. The table proper lifetimes of particles have to be removed from the physical literature and be replaced by the measured real lifetimes simultaneously with the measured velocities of elementary particles. The incorrect notions of Einstein’s closed vicious circle lead to logical assumptions for the incorrect notions in physics such as different times in different frames, length contraction, energy-momentum tensor, paradox of twins, clock paradox, equivalence of mass and energy etc. That’s why it is necessary to remove this chaos from physics and to bring the results of classical experiments in the right proportion (the place they belong to).

It is not possible to reject Einstein’s theory of relativity by one or by a few experiments. It is necessary to start from vicious circle... The combination of the time "coordinate" with space coordinates into space-time and vicious circle originating from this is a big mathematical mistake.

This is deception of physicists including Einstein.

The big part of "proofs" of validity of the special theory of relativity arose in the earlies, when the theory was new and not yet generally accepted. The experiments should examine, test or contradict the special theory of relativity.

They are Fizeau’s, Harre’s, Kaufmann’s, Michelson-Morley’s experiments.

All of them will be judged in light of the new theory of relativity. We suppose it will be done on the basis of a new definition of medium, our new generalized law of inertia, law of propagation of light (waves, intensity), our new definition of equivalent system of coordinates of our principle of relativity, Doppler’s principle of correct relations, of the form of intensity of moving charge of electric field - the new theory, non-linear form of interference field in moving medium, and the always valid (not only in statics) Maxwell’s equations.